Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Compression ratio for 2056, While i am at it
worn
post Aug 22 2019, 08:20 PM
Post #1


can't remember
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,145
Joined: 3-June 11
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 13,152
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Pulled the motor after several years of service from the 2056 build. Two problems have plagued me. The reason i pulled the engine was to seal persistent oil leaks. I am going after the oil pump and some gaskets and seals. The second problem has always been cylinder head temps. They are kinda high. I built the motor to have a 9.0:1 compression ratio, which works in my cast iron block, water cooled TR6. On further consideration, that may be a tad high. Especially after a few hours of highway driving in the summer.
The internet has lots of calculators to do the math. I can get or may already have cylinder shims. What ought it to be? The goal is dependable gobbling of miles with some increased power due a 2056. Suggested ratios? Guess i should have asked this question some time ago.
Thanks folks. You are great.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
falcor75
post Aug 22 2019, 10:25 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,579
Joined: 22-November 12
From: Sweden
Member No.: 15,176
Region Association: Scandinavia



I'm running 10,3:1 in my 78x96 engine so if everything else in yours is up to par it should be ok. At cruise my CHT's sit around 150-160° C (300-320F)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
76-914
post Aug 23 2019, 08:05 AM
Post #3


Repeat Offender & Resident Subaru Antagonist
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,490
Joined: 23-January 09
From: Temecula, CA
Member No.: 9,964
Region Association: Southern California



@McMark might be the person to ask. He's built several of them. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yeahmag
post Aug 23 2019, 11:43 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,421
Joined: 18-April 05
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 3,946
Region Association: Southern California



The engine is a combo. We would need to know what cam, heads and headwork, and exhaust you are running.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
worn
post Aug 23 2019, 11:52 AM
Post #5


can't remember
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,145
Joined: 3-June 11
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 13,152
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(yeahmag @ Aug 23 2019, 09:43 AM) *

The engine is a combo. We would need to know what cam, heads and headwork, and exhaust you are running.


I am running a cam from webcam described as using the "Raby grind". The exhausts are backdated from 1976 to a 1974 era SSI exhaust. I am using the stock EFI and I tweaked the MPS. I want to keep the fuel injection. #3 cylinder head plug has reached 400° F on uphills in the summer (when everything isn't frozen solid here).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yeahmag
post Aug 23 2019, 12:03 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,421
Joined: 18-April 05
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 3,946
Region Association: Southern California



I'm guessing that's a Webcam #73 variant for DJet. I would say that 8.0:1 to 8.5:1 would be more appropriate, but I'm not an expert on that cam. So, next you need to consider timing and AFR. What are those set to?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
worn
post Aug 23 2019, 06:35 PM
Post #7


can't remember
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,145
Joined: 3-June 11
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 13,152
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(yeahmag @ Aug 23 2019, 10:03 AM) *

I'm guessing that's a Webcam #73 variant for DJet. I would say that 8.0:1 to 8.5:1 would be more appropriate, but I'm not an expert on that cam. So, next you need to consider timing and AFR. What are those set to?

Timing is set stock. If i run much leaner than 10:1 the engine runs hot. However the engine gives better performance around 13:1 or even leaner. Yes, the cam is a 73 plus 2.5 degrees as i recall. Have to look at the card to be sure.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yeahmag
post Aug 23 2019, 10:22 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,421
Joined: 18-April 05
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 3,946
Region Association: Southern California



John Connolly of aircooled.net (who I trust) recommends 7.8-8:1 on that cam. I’d guess that’s a smoking gun assuming everything else is good.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
worn
post Aug 23 2019, 10:38 PM
Post #9


can't remember
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,145
Joined: 3-June 11
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 13,152
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(yeahmag @ Aug 23 2019, 08:22 PM) *

John Connolly of aircooled.net (who I trust) recommends 7.8-8:1 on that cam. I’d guess that’s a smoking gun assuming everything else is good.

Thanks! I guess i should look at my collection of spacers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
porschetub
post Aug 23 2019, 11:20 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,697
Joined: 25-July 15
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 18,995
Region Association: None



QUOTE(worn @ Aug 24 2019, 12:35 PM) *

QUOTE(yeahmag @ Aug 23 2019, 10:03 AM) *

I'm guessing that's a Webcam #73 variant for DJet. I would say that 8.0:1 to 8.5:1 would be more appropriate, but I'm not an expert on that cam. So, next you need to consider timing and AFR. What are those set to?

Timing is set stock. If i run much leaner than 10:1 the engine runs hot. However the engine gives better performance around 13:1 or even leaner. Yes, the cam is a 73 plus 2.5 degrees as i recall. Have to look at the card to be sure.

What is your stock timing?,with that comp maybe a dial back a touch,just saying,cheers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Aug 24 2019, 11:05 AM
Post #11


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



Web #73 cam a 8.5 CR is about the max, make sure to check both sides. You can stack base shims, 3 max.

Big engines, oversize intake/exhaust, large duration (overlap) carb cams (or aftermarket FI) are the ones that can run higher CR.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rbzymek
post Aug 28 2019, 02:43 PM
Post #12


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 195
Joined: 5-April 19
From: Northville, MI
Member No.: 23,013
Region Association: Upper MidWest



So I will be receiving my SCAT 2056 long block in a couple weeks. I requested a Web 73 cam and 8.5:1 CR. They did the build with new type 2 heads and 42x38 valves. This will allow me to re-use my tin and intake system. The exhaust valves will be sodium filled, with SS 2.0L heat exchangers. I plan to use my L-Jet FI from the 1.8 that I am rebuilding. After reading this thread I am wondering if I will have temperature issues. I do have a taco plate temp gauge but it only has a red zone, no numerics. I also have a wide band AFR meter for tuning. The engine is ready to ship at this point. Any suggestions or things to look out for? Better temp gauge? How hot is too hot? Thanks in advance.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rbzymek
post Aug 28 2019, 03:53 PM
Post #13


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 195
Joined: 5-April 19
From: Northville, MI
Member No.: 23,013
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Make that 40x33 valves.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
worn
post Aug 28 2019, 08:16 PM
Post #14


can't remember
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,145
Joined: 3-June 11
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 13,152
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Aug 24 2019, 09:05 AM) *

Web #73 cam a 8.5 CR is about the max, make sure to check both sides. You can stack base shims, 3 max.

Big engines, oversize intake/exhaust, large duration (overlap) carb cams (or aftermarket FI) are the ones that can run higher CR.

Thanks. I probably should mill thespigots, but don’t want to split the case. Deck heights on one side are about 0.010 different between sides. Is it ok to use shims under the cylinders to even things up? Have to re-read the Wilson book again.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
worn
post Aug 28 2019, 08:19 PM
Post #15


can't remember
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,145
Joined: 3-June 11
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 13,152
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(rbzymek @ Aug 28 2019, 01:53 PM) *

Make that 40x33 valves.

Hope that you are very happy about the way the car moves. I was on the highway with the ‘72 3.2 conversion. Big smile just emerged and stayed there. Sunny day, and i am driving the car of my dreams.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rick 918-S
post Aug 28 2019, 09:12 PM
Post #16


Hey nice rack! -Celette
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,419
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Now in Superior WI
Member No.: 43
Region Association: Northstar Region



Carb cam. The overlap is likely causing a pulse in the intake thumping the maps. Not ideal. I would install a FI cam, leave the compression as is, add a lightened flywheel, and tune the injection with a exhaust sniffer if you can get the air fuel ratio right at cruising speed the engine should run cooler.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Aug 28 2019, 09:16 PM
Post #17


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



Web #73 is a stock FI duration cam with a hair more lift.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rick 918-S
post Aug 28 2019, 09:25 PM
Post #18


Hey nice rack! -Celette
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,419
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Now in Superior WI
Member No.: 43
Region Association: Northstar Region



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Aug 28 2019, 10:16 PM) *

Web #73 is a stock FI duration cam with a hair more lift.


Cooling flaps working then? Compression alone will not cause a hot condition that cannot be solved.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Aug 29 2019, 02:03 AM
Post #19


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(rbzymek @ Aug 28 2019, 02:53 PM) *

Make that 40x33 valves.

Why such small valves?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 01:10 AM